This could be the most interesting Lamley Awards Poll of the year.
Hot Wheels Basics had a stellar year. The signature line has taken a bit of a backseat in recent years, with the emergence of HW Premium and the resurgence of the RLC, but not this year.
While Premium was diving deeper into its themed lines, Basic seemed to get a bit more adventurous. The variety of models expanded, and the line seemed more playful. Custom cars, always a Hot Wheels staple, got more fun, from a wild 68 Camaro to a winking Supra. And the true replicated cars were surprises. Classics like the ducktail Porsche and a proper first-gen Viper, as well THE 80’s Mercedes.
The point is there was a lot to like. Add to that the HW team used their nice large Fast & Furious budget to releases other basic models outside of the mainline. So they are included here as well.
So here we are, ready to pick the best, and figure out which model disappointed us the most. As always, the best is easy to define. But because there are so many, you can select up to 3 models that you thought were the best, and the model that gets the most votes will emerge the winner.
For most disappointing, it has become a yearly tradition to explain what that means. IT IS NOT THE WORST! It means the model that you were looking forward to the most that didn’t live up the expectations. I always think this is a more interesting vote, and helps define things more.
For that reason, I have eliminated HW Originals – or fantasy models – like I awlays do, as well as motorcycles. And this year the Tooned models are out as well. That means the F&F Charger, Supra, and Porsche. There are essentially normal proportioned castings of those, and the Tooned style can skew the vote. So we are keeping it to licensed “realistically” proportioned cars. If that makes sense. And of those, vote for the model that disappointed you the most.
So let’s do this. Watch the video, check out the photos, and vote below. This should be a good one.























































Leave a Reply